Topics & Your Comments

Survey: Conceptual coast land sketch

EnvisionCape in Surveys September 3, 2019

Among other things, any rezoning must balance the scale and number of housing units with tangible benefits to the community. Architect Frits de Vries has sketched one approach on his own initiative to help the community visualize an option that features large areas of public land. (Please refer to the drawing above.) This 16-hectare portion comprises lots 20-23 on the south coast. It isn’t a formal proposal to the community, but well worth talking about. As yet, we don’t know what will be truly feasible - or acceptable to the community - so please remember that these are ideas, not promises. We need to know what things you value most and priorize those to avoid disappointing people. We give great thanks for Frits’ work and insights.

Name

First

Last

You can indicate at the bottom of this form if you wish to remain anonymous or allow us to show your comments on the website.

Your impressions

	Very Undesirable	Not desirable	Neutral	Desirable	Very Desirable
1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast?	1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast? Very Undesirable	1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast? Not desirable	1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast? Neutral	1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast? Desirable	1. In general, would you like the idea of a development in this area if it provided public access to the coast? Very Desirable
2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land?	2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land? Very Undesirable	2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land? Not desirable	2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land? Neutral	2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land? Desirable	2. Does this rough design create a good balance between housing and new public land? Very Desirable

3. If multifamily buildings would be acceptable to you in the area where three clusters of buildings are shown in the top right portion of the drawing, what kind would you support?

	Very undesirable	Not desirable	Neutral	Desirable	Very Desirable
Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots	Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots Very undesirable	Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots Not desirable	Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots Neutral	Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots Desirable	Small homes on less than 1/4 acre lots Very Desirable
Row houses	Row houses Very undesirable	Row houses Not desirable	Row houses Neutral	Row houses Desirable	Row houses Very Desirable
Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors)	Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors) Very undesirable	Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors) Not desirable	Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors) Neutral	Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors) Desirable	Stacked townhouses (two storey units stacked on top of each other = 4 floors) Very Desirable
Duplexes	Duplexes Very undesirable	Duplexes Not desirable	Duplexes Neutral	Duplexes Desirable	Duplexes Very Desirable
Triplexes	Triplexes Very undesirable	Triplexes Not desirable	Triplexes Neutral	Triplexes Desirable	Triplexes Very Desirable
Quadriplexes	Quadriplexes Very undesirable	Quadriplexes Not desirable	Quadriplexes Neutral	Quadriplexes Desirable	Quadriplexes Very Desirable

4. Other thoughts?

Follow the Story • Add Your Own

We want to make it as easy as possible for you to express your perspectives, in person, on paper and online.

Survey results are compiled as a whole and will be reported on this site.
Individuals' surveys won't be published. Comments will only be published with permission.

May we post your comments on this website?

May we include your name with your comments?

Email (required) *

We won't add your to our mail list without your specific permission (see below). This just helps us be aware when people submit more than once.

Would you like to keep up to date by joining our email newsletter list?

Message

Thank you so much for contributing to our understanding.

Home

Etiam magna arcu, ullamcorper ut pulvinar et, ornare sit amet ligula. Aliquam vitae bibendum lorem. Cras id dui lectus.

ADDRESS

63739 street lorem ipsum City, Country

PHONE

+12 (0) 345 678 9

EMAIL

info@company.com

Search Remarks from the Community
Search
search
Search categories

Consultation(11)
Docks(5)
Features(13)
Growth(13)
Nature(25)
Rezoning(16)
Transport(9)
Trust(28)
Water(9)

Search by tags

1st Rezoning(1)
Aging in Place(3)
aspiration(72)
Build trust(13)
Business(1)
Camping(3)
Candy Ho(9)
Carbon(1)
concern(69)
Consultation(2)
Fall 2018 brochure(4)
Farm(4)
Ferry(5)
History(23)
impact(1)
Impact Study(1)
Island(7)
Kayak and paddleboard rentals(1)
Location(3)
Meetingplace(1)
Motives(4)
nature(5)
ocp(2)
Parks(14)
population(1)
Question(5)
Restaurant(1)
roads(2)
Spa(1)
Sticky(1)
Trails(4)
Transparency(1)
Transport(1)
Why Rezone(17)